Edmonton, May 28-30, 2023

Due to the numerous requests from LPs. Micro and Craft growers along with some of the largest cannabis retail stores in the nation, Grow Up has decided to bring our award winning show to Alberta. We will be hosting our 7th Conference and Expo at the Edmonton Convention Centre in beautiful downtown Edmonton.

U.K. drug policy: How seizing passports will not stop illicit dug use

Oct 14, 2022 | Media Partners, The GrowthOp

This post is presented by our media partner The Growth Op
View the original article here.

Research has long shown that punitive measures are not a deterrent

Article content

In an attempt to clamp down on recreational drug use, the British government recently set out a three-tier system for dealing with people caught in possession of illegal substances.

Advertisement 2

Story continues below

Article content

A scale of punishments would be introduced for those caught in possession once, twice or three times. These would begin with a fine and culminate in a variety of deeply punitive options such as tagging offenders, suspending their driving licence and even confiscating their passport.

Article content

All this is being promoted as part of a government plan, entitled Swift, Certain, Tough: new consequences for drug possession, which aims to bring overall drug use down to “a historic 30-year low” by “delivering a generational shift in demand.”

Other nations, including the U.S., Jamaica and Thailand are modernizing their drug policies and moving away from criminalization. The U.K., meanwhile, seems determined to disregard the evidence that has for decades contradicted the idea that ever-tougher responses are needed.

Advertisement 3

Story continues below

Article content

Research has long shown that punitive measures are not a deterrent. Further, most illegal drug use is recreational, more commonly associated with leisure and pleasure than criminality. Research shows that recreational drug use rarely leads to addiction or requires treatment.

The government seems far from understanding this, as is evident when it calls drugs the “root of untold harm and misery across our society” in its reform proposals. It is questionable whether this reductionist discourse applies to any drug user — there are, for example, functioning heroin addicts who live normal productive lives — let alone recreational drugs and their users.

Evidence shows criminalizing otherwise law-abiding citizens for their drug use does not deter them from doing it. In fact, it merely serves to damage their life chances.

Advertisement 4

Story continues below

Article content

We know that a conviction makes it harder for people (and particularly young people) to find housing, get a job and travel. It also makes them more likely to continue offending. All this should make the government think long and hard about which offences therefore justify serious punishment.

Punitive measures are discriminatory in practice

Drug laws and their punishments are not applied equitably and tend to discriminate along the lines of class, and gender, as we have already seen with cannabis warnings. Cannabis warnings are issued by the police for those found in possession of a small amount of cannabis and operate as the first stage of a similar three-tiered escalation system implemented to deal with cannabis use.

Advertisement 5

Story continues below

Article content

And when it comes to race, they discriminate too. In London, black people, often from deprived areas, receive cannabis warnings at three times the rate of white people.

Law enforcement measures are being used to deter recreational drug use, while more harmful substances such as alcohol, tobacco and sugar remain legal and socially acceptable. This, despite the research being clear on how such substances cause more harm than many of their illicit counterparts. A truly evidence-based approach to drugs would look very different.

The proposed new “three-tier” approach may appear to be a reform but the reality is that while the government’s proposed punishments for first and second offences may appear to err towards decriminalization, the punishments for third offences — tagging offenders, suspending their driving licences and confiscating their passports — are extreme.

Advertisement 6

Story continues below

Article content

Ultimately, this remains a law enforcement approach that has already been shown to be ineffective. It will not bring overall drug use down. It will, however, undoubtedly cause untold harm to thousands of people.

Instead of focusing on low-level possession of recreational drugs, we need realistic, effective, evidence-based ways to reduce the harms of drugs, in terms of use and supply. We also need to support those drug users who want support, rather than inflicting punishments that will disproportionately criminalize certain groups of users.

Tammy Ayres is a lecturer in Criminology at the University of Leicester.

Stuart Taylor works at The Open University.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence and was first published on Oct. 13, 2022. Read the original article.

Advertisement 1

Story continues below

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

This post was originally published by our media partner here.

Grow Up – September 11-13, 2022
Niagara Falls Convention Centre, ON

News from Grow Up Media partners