An overview of Social Credit

by Grow Up Conference | Oct 7, 2024 | Media Partners, The New Agora

Social Credit is a socio-economic philosophy wherein consumers, fully provided with adequate purchasing power, establish the policy of production through exercise of their monetary vote. In this view, the term economic democracy does not mean worker control of industry. Removing the policy of production from banking institutions, government, and industry, Social Credit envisages an “aristocracy of producers, serving and accredited by a democracy of consumers”. (C.H. Douglas, Credit-Power and Democracy.)

The term Social Credit, as a formal name, originated from the writings of British engineer and originator of the Social Credit movement, Clifford Hugh Douglas (1879-1952), who wrote a book by that name in 1924. According to Douglas, the true purpose of production is consumption, and production must serve the genuine, freely expressed interests of consumers. Each citizen is to have a beneficial, not direct, inheritance in the communal capital conferred by complete and dynamic access to the fruits of industry assured by the National Dividend and Compensated Price. Assuming the only safe place for power is in many hands, Social Credit is a distributive philosophy, and its policy is to disperse power to individuals. The Social Credit philosophy is best summed up by Douglas when he said, “Systems were made for man, and not man for systems, and the interest of man which is self-development, is above all systems, whether theological, political or economic.” (Douglas, Economic Democracy.)

Social Credit Economic Policy

C. H. Douglas proposed that a rate of income less than prices generated during any production period results in deficiency in purchasing power. His A+B theorem states that if A is all wages, salaries and dividends paid to consumers and B is the cost of overhead and depreciation not paid to consumers, then prices charged for all goods must be at least A+B. But since only A payments are received as income, then consumer purchasing power is typically less than prices generated during the same production period.

Douglas suggested that widespread unemployment, debt, poverty and war are inevitable to sustain such a system. As automation progressively replaces human labour in production, Douglas believed Social Credit could ensure enough purchasing power for consumers to buy all goods produced along with ample leisure time. His Social Credit solution included three core components:

1. A National Dividend to provide all citizens with a basic income guarantee, regardless of employment status.
2. A Compensated Price (price adjustment mechanism) that reflects the real cost of production as the mean rate of consumption over the mean rate of production for an equivalent period of time.
3. A National Credit Office to statistically calculate the amount of credit that should be circulating in the economy.

Economic theory

Douglas disagreed with classical economists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo who divided the factors of production into land, labour and capital. He also disagreed with Karl Marx who claimed that labour created all wealth. Douglas believed the “cultural inheritance of society” was the primary factor in production. Our cultural inheritance is defined as the knowledge, technique and processes that have been handed down to us incrementally from the origins of civilization. Consequently, we do not have to keep “reinventing the wheel”. “We are merely the administrators of that cultural inheritance, and to that extent the cultural inheritance is the property of all of us, without exception.” (Douglas, The Monopolistic Idea.) Douglas also criticized classical economics because it was based upon a barter economy; whereas, the modern economy is a monetary one.

The Nature of Money and Credit

To the classical economist, money is a medium of exchange. This may have once been the case when the majority of wealth was produced by individuals who subsequently exchanged it with each other. But in modern economies, division of labour splits production into multiple processes, and wealth is produced by people working in association with each other. For instance, an automobile worker does not produce any wealth (i.e., the automobile) by himself, but only in conjunction with other auto workers, the producers of roads, gasoline, insurance etc..

In this view, wealth is a pool upon which people can draw, and the efficiency gained by individuals cooperating in the productive process are known as the “unearned increment of association” – historic accumulations of which constitute what Douglas called the “cultural heritage”. The means of drawing upon this pool are the tickets distributed by the banking system.

Initially, money originated from the productive system, when cattle owners punched leather discs which represented a head of cattle. These discs could then be exchanged for corn, and the corn producers could then exchange the disc for a head of cattle at a later date. The word “pecuniary” comes from the Latin “pecus“, meaning “cattle”. Today, the productive system and the distributive/monetary system are two separate entities. Douglas demonstrated that loans create deposits, and presented mathematical proof in his book Social Credit. Bank credit comprises the vast majority of money, and is created every time a bank makes a loan. Douglas was also one of the first to understand the creditary nature of money. The word credit derives from the Latin “credere”, meaning “to believe”. “The essential quality of money, therefore, is that a man shall believe that he can get what he wants by the aid of it.” (Douglas, Warning Democracy.)

Money should not be regarded as a commodity but rather as a ticket, a means of distribution of production. “There are two sides to this question of a ticket representing something that we can call, if we like, a value. There is the ticket itself – the money which forms the thing we call ‘effective demand’ – and there is something we call a price opposite to it.” (Douglas, The Use of Money.) Money is effective demand, and the means of reclaiming that money are prices and taxes. As real capital replaces labour in the process of modernization, money should become increasingly an instrument of distribution.

Douglas also claimed the problem of production, or scarcity, had long been solved. The new problem was one of distribution. Douglas criticized the banking system on two counts: 1) for being a form of government which has been centralizing its power for centuries, and 2) for claiming ownership to the money they create. The latter he claimed was equivalent to claiming ownership of the nation. Money, Douglas claimed, was merely an abstract representation of the real credit of the community, which is the ability of the community to deliver goods and services, when, and where they are required.

Political theory

C.H. Douglas defined democracy as the “will of the people”, not rule by the majority (Douglas, The Nature of Democracy), suggesting that Social Credit could be implemented by any political party supported by effective public demand. Once implemented to achieve a realistic integration of means and ends, party politics could cease to exist. Traditional ballot box democracy is incompatible with Social Credit, which assumes the right of individuals to choose freely one thing at a time, and to contract out of unsatisfactory associations. Douglas advocated what he called the “responsible vote”, where anonymity in the voting process would no longer exist. “The individual voter must be made individually responsible, not collectively taxable, for his vote.”

Opposing the formation of Social Credit Parties, C.H. Douglas believed a group of elected amateurs should never direct a group of competent experts in technical matters. While experts are ultimately responsible for achieving results, the goal of politicians should be to pressure those experts to deliver policy results desired by the populace. According to Douglas, “the proper function of Parliament is to force all activities of a public nature to be carried on so that the individuals who comprise the public may derive the maximum benefit from them. Once the idea is grasped, the criminal absurdity of the party system becomes evident.” (Douglas, The Tragedy of Human Effort.)

Social Credit Philosophy

Douglas described Social Credit as “a policy of a philosophy”, and warned against viewing it solely as a scheme for monetary reform. He coined this philosophy “practical Christianity” – the central issue of which is the Incarnation. Douglas believed there was a Canon which ran through the universe, and Jesus Christ was the Incarnation of this Canon. However, he also believed Christianity remained ineffective so long as it remained transcendental. Religion, which derives from the Latin word relegare (to “bind back”), was intended to be a binding back to reality.

Social Credit is concerned with the incarnation of Christian principles in our organic affairs. Specifically, it is concerned with the principles of association and how to maximize the increments of association which redound to satisfaction of the individual in society – while minimizing any decrements of association. Social Credit elevates the importance of the individual and holds that all institutions exist to serve the individual – that the State exists to serve its citizens, not that individuals exist to serve the State.

The goal of Social Credit is to maximize immanent sovereignty. Social Credit is consonant with the Christian doctrine of Salvation through unearned Grace, and is therefore incompatible with any variant of the doctrine of salvation through works. Works need not be have Purity of intent or desirable consequence and in themselves alone be as “filthy rags”. For instance, the present system makes destructive, obscenely wasteful wars a virtual certainty – which provides lots of “work” for everyone. Social Credit has been called the Third Alternative to the futile Left–Right Duality.

Although Douglas defined Social Credit as a philosophy with Christian roots, he did not envision a Christian theocracy. Practical Christian society is trinitarian in structure, based upon a constitution where the constitution is an organism changing in relation to our knowledge of the nature of the universe. Social Credit society recognizes the fact that the relationship between man and God is unique.

In this view, it is essential to allow man the greatest possible freedom in order to pursue this relationship. If people are given the economic security and leisure achievable in the context of a Social Credit dispensation, most would end their service to mammon and use their free time pursuing spiritual, intellectual, or cultural goals leading to self-development.

Douglas said that Social Crediters want to build a new civilization based upon absolute economic security for the individual – where “… they shall sit every man [individual] under his [her] vine and under his [her] fig tree; and none shall make them afraid.” In keeping with this goal, Douglas was opposed to all forms of taxation on real property. This set Social Credit at variance from the land-taxing recommendations of Henry George.

Douglas opposed what he termed “the pyramid of power”. Totalitarianism reflects this pyramid and is the antithesis of Social Credit. It turns the government into an end instead of a means, and the individual into a means instead of an end – Demon est deus inversus – “the devil is God upside down”. Social Credit is designed to give the individual the maximum freedom allowable given the need for association in economic, political and social matters. “The progress of human society is best measured by the extent of its creative ability. Imbued with a number of natural gifts, notably reason, memory, understanding and free will, man has learned gradually to master the secrets of nature, and to build for himself a world wherein lie the potentialities of peace, security, liberty and abundance.”

Social Credit rejects dialectical materialistic philosophy. Douglas divided philosophy into two schools of thought that he labeled the “classical school”, and the “modern school”, which are broadly represented by philosophies of Aristotle and Francis Bacon respectively. Douglas was critical of both schools of thought, but believed that “the truth lies in appreciation of the fact that neither conception is useful without the other”.

https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/social-credit/item/an-overview-of-social-credit

Further resources:

Major C.H. Douglas on “The Causes of War” – part 1

Major C.H. Douglas on “The Causes of War” – part 2

The Clifford Hugh Douglas Institute

The Australian League of Rights

https://cultivateelevate.com/antioxidant-trio-6mix-dragons-blood-pearl-powder/?ref=2bfG3v4vqhqnIp

The Mind Controlled Road to Hell

by Grow Up Conference | Oct 7, 2024 | Media Partners, The New Agora

The Mind Controlled Road to Hell

By Julian Rose

The proponents of a transhuman AI future are a clinically insane, anti-life demonic cult. With this at the forefront of your mind, ask yourself: do I still want to do business with them?

If the answer is ‘No’, then take immediate steps to adopt a life style as diametrically opposite as possible from the one that makes one dependent on both the tools and mindset of their trade.

I stress ‘mindset’ because the state of mind behind the push to turn human beings into biocomputers is not sufficiently rejected by the majority of those using the cult’s tech.

There is almost no concentrated thought being applied to this already advanced enslavement process, therefore those not questioning their attachment to the EMF (Electro Magnetic Frequency) digital tech, lack the ability to resist the insidious capture of their best energies.

One can only put an end to something by first recognising its existence and one’s reliance on it.

This is the first phase of release from slavery and in taking control of one’s destiny.

So, what could such a diametrically opposite lifestyle to one of toxic IT dependency be?

Firstly, a re-earthing. A rational process that taps into common sense and frees one from blind acceptance of an ever more dominant digital control system.

This could, in practice, take many different forms and go in many different directions, but all would be about getting out of jail while one still can.

ELECTRICITY is being pushed centre stage as the key tool for both ‘convenience’ and 24/7 invasive surveillance and control.

Consider the fact that all commercial alternative energy sources are about generating electricity. Electricity for public transportation, private cars, cooking, heat pumps (home heating), metering systems, telephone chargers, just about all communication tools, a plethora of household items, street lights, air conditioning, ventilation systems…the list goes on and on.

So, why is the Net Zero by 2045 scam so determined to replace carbon fuel sources with non carbon based electric energy? Anything to do with climate amelioration issues?

No, of course not.

Electricity is the energy choice most obviously connected with the ability to control. The perfect medium for a fully centralised energy surveillance grid.

Now, consider the ever increasing percentage of communication systems and household items that are moving, or have already moved, from cable based distribution to WiFi.

Around 90% of all domestic utility gismos (within the post industrial Northern World) are likely to be WiFi based within the next four to five years. Not because we want that, most of us don’t – but because our protagonists see wireless as the most seamless medium for our ‘management’.

Add to this terrestrial monopolisation process, ‘the cloud’ EMF powered grid, designed to act as a global surveillance, communications and zapping weapon – all in one. Operating out of tens of thousands of satellites – a significant number of which have already been launched into low orbit by Elon Musk’s Starlink program and other related enterprises.

The ‘hive mind internet of everything’ is planned to operate out of this grid of low vibrating EMF microwaves linked-up to 5G towers – and all combining to cover the entire earth’s surface.

Whatever WiFi receiving systems one has will be both a recipient of – and a transmitter into – this highly toxic ‘smart cloud’.

Furthermore, metallic nanoparticles found to be present in chemtrail operations and ‘vaccination’ ingredients, will render human beings energetic conductors/receptors of electronic pulses. An open target of mind control extending into physical body organ manipulation and gene modification.

However, the order of importance in taking steps to guard against becoming an open target of such destruction, must start with WiFi based electronic items that are carried on one’s body on a daily basis.

This is a massive stumbling block for almost all current holders of mobile phones, the great majority of whom cannot even imagine detaching themselves from these ultimate tools of control.
Mobiles are called ‘cell’ phones in America – a very apt description.

In fact, it appears to be the case that there is a subconscious, and in some cases conscious belief that these wireless gadgets are a symbol of ‘progress’ for the human race as a whole. Some, like followers of Yuval Noah Harari, see them as a godly tech; ‘Deus ex machina’, bringing one closer to the omega point of life itself.

Whereas all they actually do – aside from changing one’s genetic and cellular disposition – is embroil one ever deeper in the stifling and soulless virtual agenda of ‘the tech’. The road to hell.

And, as you will surely know by now, this is where the dark architects of control want us to be.

Take undisciplined fascination in – and reliance upon – the tech far enough and one becomes submerged into it.

“Where attention goes energy flows” is not just a nice little parable, it is an observational truth that has been opened-up to the world by the pioneers of quantum physics.

It could be added that where ‘inattention’ goes, slavery follows.

The architects of control are working at reducing living, sentient, emotional beings to biological computers programmed into the matrix of the hive mind, and a large portion of the population are presenting themselves as a blank canvas for this operation.

It is this largely unconscious mindset which must be broken in order for humanity to rescue itself from life in a permanently programmed ‘smart’ prison.

A life in which no possibility of spontaneous creative expression remains and only crumbs are offered as sustenance for mind, body and soul.

The trap has been set, but its motive and end ambition are at least now exposed.

That means that those who can still act with discernment and right brain motivation can take the decisive steps necessary to change their circumstances in accordance with their intention not to be victims.

There are two key steps to be taken. One is material and the other is mental/spiritual.

The material one involves paring down one’s life to an uncluttered, simple and essentially rudimentary way of life in a non urban location in which one has the ability to take some controlling influence over one’s basic needs.

Pure water, living food, fresh (as possible) air and reasonable shelter. None of these will be 100% uncontaminated, but will nevertheless offer the foundation for a healthy and active existence, within the relative calm of a landscape still influenced by and reflecting the rejuvenating powers of nature.

Cities and large towns are the chosen epicentres of electromagnetic frequency targeting and low quality environmental health hazards. Avoid them if you can.

The second step is mental/spiritual. But ‘second’ is an inappropriate description. It is a need that should be attended to simultaneously with the material. Body, mind and spirit are not disconnected phenomena.

Those wishing to free themselves from the architects of control must recognise that the world is in the grip of a demonic mass indoctrination process which can only be truly counteracted by a properly developed psychic (mental) attitude coupled with a determined raising of spiritual energies.

The Masonic/Luciferian insentient and psychopathic condition survives by feeding on negative energies emanating from those it imprisons. Shift one’s energetic point of focus to the realisation of
those higher powers that patiently await one’s attention on the other side if the veil – and one becomes out of reach to the dark forces. Out of reach of low vibrational attacks on one’s psyche.

Not only that, one starts experiencing the rising of a power one may never have thought one possessed; or which one though was only an external phenomenon.

Contrary to what many believe, this sense of inner awakening is not progressed by exclusive adoption of a reclusive inward centred form of contemplation, but by stepping out into the world and taking strong actions that confront injustice and oppression. What in spiritual terms is called ‘service to humanity.’

It is only when an inner nurturing of one’s true power is matched by making use of that power to bring positive change into the world, that true personal growth and awakening gain proper traction and one’s deeper being starts to blossom into a powerful energetic force for good.

It’s vital to understand that it is only when both inner nurturing (i.e. meditation) and outer action for social, mental, physical, economic, political, animal and environmental planetary amelioration are combined – that the key to unlock the door to a metamorphosis of our divided and war torn world is finally achieved.
A true mental and spiritual dynamic empowers us to face the reality of the world courageously, with a burning desire to transform stagnant and degraded life forces into fountains of deeply uplifting energy.

This is the true human dynamic. This is the state available to all of us once we grasp the fact that we are here on this earth to make actual the extraordinary potential we are born with. That which is latent in every one of the thirteen million cells of our body.

We are on earth, but we are from the cosmos. We are universal sparks of the Supreme Nucleus that brought all life into being.

We are not here to be plodding along in slavish lockstep with some top down death wish.

It is only because we have accepted the authority of that which deceives us into believing that we are lesser mortals, fit only for a three dimensional prison camp, that a great victory for life over death still remains a chimera.

It’s more than time to break free. Being the self indoctrinated victim of a delusion is no way to spend our brief manifestation on planet earth.

There’s work to be done – lot’s of it – and the urge to accomplish this work is the most insistent message of our deepest calling. We ignore it at our peril.

By embracing the call to action we set in motion the realisation of both our individual and collective emancipation – and that of all living beings with whom we share this planet.

So go to it – immediately – and never look back.

Julian Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, a writer, broadcaster and international activist. He is author of the acclaimed title ‘Overcoming the Robotic Mind’. Do visit his website
www.julianrose.info for further information.