With an early federal election looking increasingly likely, there are several issues those in the cannabis industry should be keeping an eye on in the coming months.
Given the current and ongoing polling and national mood, this article is written with the assumption that the next government will be a Conservative one led by Pierre Poileivre.
If an election is called, it could mean changes to several ongoing issues the industry is focused on. Here are a few worth watching.
Regulatory changes
Health Canada delivered a large package of proposals and changed the federal cannabis rules and regulations in 2024, lowering fees and regulatory requirements and increasing the amount of cannabis that micros can grow and process. Since they were first proposed, the changes have been expected to come into force in early to mid-2025.
If an election is called at any point, these regulatory proposals will not immediately stop as they would if they were legislation (like a proposed bill), but this would mean that the work would be primarily paused until the end of the election. The new government could then choose to continue that work, pause it indefinitely, or even scrap it entirely.
If the new government is the Liberal Party of Canada, under the leadership of Trudeau or someone else, then such work will likely continue, and the final changes will be solidified and posted on Gazette II.
However, if the new government is, as expected, the Conservative Party of Canada under the leadership of Pierre Poilievre, then it is possible the work will be shelved, possibly indefinitely, or even scrapped entirely. The Conservatives would likely not lose much political capital in doing so and might even gain some capital among specific sectors of their base.
That said, it’s also possible that given the general red-tape-reduction and streamlining nature of the proposed changes, a new conservative government could still implement all or some of these proposed changes. However, it wouldn’t necessarily need to be given the same level of priority in terms of implementation as the Liberals would likely have given.
Excise stamps
The federal government also recently said it’s considering possibly moving from 13 separate cannabis excise stamps to one national one, something the industry has been asking for. The timeline for this consideration was next spring. Similar to the issues relating to the proposed regulatory package, a new government would not necessarily need to keep such a promise, and an election could, at best, slow down the process of investigating the issue.
Related Articles
Conservatives and cannabis
The above issues relate to ongoing work the current government has done on the cannabis file. But what could a Conservative federal government mean for the cannabis industry and the associated Act and Regulations, in general?
This is a very broad question that deserves its own in-depth analysis, as there are many layers to consider, but here are a few high-level considerations:
The Conservatives have several known talking points related to the cannabis file that could signal the possible direction a new Conservative-led federal government might take.
Medical cannabis: The Conservatives have, in the past, tried to make significant changes to Canada’s medical cannabis access programs. Repeatedly forced to manage the medical cannabis file by the courts, in 2013, the Conservatives first tried to get rid of the ability for medical cannabis users entirely, with approval from a health care provider, to grow their own cannabis or to designate someone to do so on their behalf.
Their messaging since that time has not changed much, with a big focus from many conservative MPs over the years to highlight how this personal and designated producer system is, at times, abused for the purpose of diversion into the illicit market. So it’s not much of a stretch to assume they will continue this focus if they again hold the reigns of power in Ottawa.
Home Grow: Not only do Conservative party members have a track record of trying to get rid of medical home grow, but many in the party have long expressed concerns with people having the right to grow their own cannabis. This was one of the many aspects of cannabis legalization that the Conservative Party outright opposed on principle, with one famous Conservative MP suggesting that young kids would be getting high with their parents’ home grow, utilizing toaster ovens. Another Conservative MP compared homegrown cannabis to being able to make fentanyl at home (seriously).
It was a Conservative Senator, Vern White, who proposed an amendment to Bill C-45, the cannabis legalization bill, that would have removed the allowance to grow up to four plants at home. The amendment was defeated 40-33. Then another Conservative senator, Claude Carignan, proposed an amendment that would have only allowed indoor cultivation. That was also defeated, in a 40-31 vote.
Even after legalization, the Conservative’s Shadow Minister of Health at the time, Marilyn Gladu, told the Globe and Mail in 2019 that the party would seek to ban home grows and further restrict personal and designated medical grow licenses while supporting larger publicly traded licensed producers.
So it’s not a stretch to suggest this could also be within their sights.
A less diverse industry: The coming into force of the federal Cannabis Act and Cannabis Regulations represented a significant shift from the previous medical-only status quo. Not only did this mean more broad access to a regulated cannabis supply chain for adults in Canada, it also meant new production regulations that were much less one-size-fits-all than the previous Conservative government’s medical rules had established.
While legalization itself was built around the basic foundation of federally licensed producers first created by Health Canada under Harper’s watch (MMPR), broader cannabis legalization simplified certain aspects of those regulations and the application process and created new licence categories to allow for smaller and less capital-rich businesses to participate. No longer was there just one large “LP” licence that could cost tens of millions and take years to apply for. Some producers today, especially micros and nurseries, can make it through the licensing process in less than a year and, at times, well under a million dollars (some have even done it for under $100,000).
This process itself, though, isn’t easy. It requires a lot of time and resources to manage the number of licences and licence categories, not only during the application process but also once they are licensed. Staff must answer phone calls, respond to emails, and undertake inspections. Licensing hundreds of small micros is not cost-effective, and a new government seeking to cut red tape and bureaucracy could view such an approach as inefficient.
If you’re working at or invested in a big licensed producer, this could be a win for you. But if you’re a smaller business operating in or looking to operate in the cannabis space, this might mean longer wait times for service. If you think it’s bad now, imagine if there were, for example, 25% fewer employees to respond to your requests.
Now, it’s not necessarily all doom and gloom. There are arguments to be made for red tape reduction and streamlining of some of the more onerous aspects of the federal regulations. But given the Conservatives’ overall resistance to the cannabis file in general (remember, all but one Conservative voted against legalization itself), it’s unlikely to see this as a priority.
Excise tax
Conservatives hate taxes, right? Well, sort of. Yes, the Conservatives, especially Pierre, have spent much time railing about the excess taxes in Canada, especially the carbon tax. “Verb the Noun!” as the slogans go.
But does this translate to excise tax reform for the cannabis industry? It’s possible, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. Any changes to the federal excise rate for cannabis mean less money for the provinces, who bring home almost all of that money. That’s not something many federal leaders would see much benefit in doing, especially on a file that most voters don’t seem to care much about, if at all.
So, what will a Conservative government in Canada mean for the cannabis industry? At best, I would prepare for less federal support, not more, and a delay in any ongoing regulatory changes, such as harmonizing excise stamps or the massive regulatory package proposal shared in 2024.
At worst, the industry should prepare for a shrinking federal regulatory agency that will seek to streamline operations, which would likely mean a redefined focus on a few touchpoints (a handful of big companies, not tons of little ones). This could be good news for the handful of big pubcos on the producer side, but for the little guys, it might be about to get a lot harder.
That said, none of this is a foregone certainty. While much of the above is negative, there’s also the possibility that with the right advice a Poilievre’s government could approach this differently, unshackling cannabis from the over-regulation of the nanny state. Some past statements in regard to edibles potency limits, for example, show some potential openness to this approach.
Coming up with a game plan to take these factors into account would be wise and might be the difference between keeping the lights on in 2025 and beyond, or not. But we’re probably going to find out sooner than later.
In a world increasingly disillusioned with the overreach of state mechanisms, the philosophy of Agorism stands as a beacon of hope, championing the ideals of a market free from the suffocating grip of governmental control. Samuel Edward Konkin III, the progenitor of this radical ideology, proposed a society where individuals interact through voluntary exchanges devoid of coercion, where the state is seen not as a protector but as an aggressor against personal freedom. This article delves into the stark contrast between the oppressive nature of state interventions and the liberating potential of Agorism, particularly highlighted by the state’s current fascination with digital currencies such as Bitcoin and their own spawn, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
Bitcoin, emerging as a defiant symbol of financial sovereignty, operates on a decentralized ledger that transcends global borders, eluding state control and its punitive tax regimes. It epitomizes the Agorist principle that true market operations require no state intervention. In stark contrast, CBDCs represent the state’s attempt to cloak its insidious control in the guise of modern financial innovation. By mimicking the technology behind cryptocurrencies, governments aim to seduce the public back into the fold of regulated financial systems, under the pretense of improved efficiency and security.
However, this maneuver is fundamentally flawed. The very essence of blockchain technology, upon which Bitcoin thrives, is its ability to operate beyond the reach of centralized control. The state, in its hubris, fails to recognize that its efforts to replicate this model within a framework of control are doomed to falter. As it grapples with implementing CBDCs, it inadvertently educates the public about the benefits of blockchain, simultaneously highlighting the inefficiencies and coercive nature of its own systems.
The push towards CBDCs and similar initiatives reveals a deeper, more systemic issue: the state’s pathological fear of losing economic control. This fear drives it to adopt half-measures that neither fully embrace the efficiency of decentralized technologies nor address the public’s growing distrust of governmental financial interventions. The result is a burgeoning curiosity and interest in Agorist principles among those who seek true economic freedom and privacy.
As we explore the state’s flawed attempts to mimic the free market and the consequent strengthening of Agorist principles, it becomes clear that these actions are not just ineffective but counterproductive. They serve as a catalyst, accelerating the expansion of the Agora—a marketplace where individuals freely exchange goods and services without the oppressive oversight of a coercive state. This exploration not only underscores the inevitable obsolescence of state-controlled economies but also heralds the rise of a new era where the market truly regulates itself, free from the clutches of governmental interference.
Agorism Explained: The Pure Free Market
Agorism, as envisioned by Samuel Edward Konkin III, is more than just a set of economic theories; it is a radical approach to living a life free from state coercion. At the heart of Agorism is the concept of the counter-economy—a network of markets and transactions that operate independently of state-sanctioned control. This includes everything from barter and local currencies to digital currencies and black markets. The underlying premise is simple yet profound: all exchanges that occur without government intervention are part of this counter-economy and thus contribute to the undermining of the state’s power.
Agorists argue that the state inherently operates through coercion, using its monopoly on violence to enforce taxes, regulations, and laws that stifle individual freedom and economic innovation. By participating in the counter-economy, individuals can weaken the state’s control over their lives, gradually expanding the scope of freedom and personal autonomy. This is not merely theoretical; it’s a practical strategy that has been embraced by many who find the state’s encroachments intolerable.
In a truly Agorist society, transactions are voluntary and mutually beneficial, reflecting the non-coercive spirit of free exchange. This philosophy extends beyond economics into all areas of social interaction, advocating for a society where individuals are free to live their lives as they see fit, without interference from any coercive external authority. Agorism thus challenges the very foundation of modern statehood, which is predicated on the assumption that some form of centralized control is necessary for society to function.
However, embracing Agorism is not without its challenges. The state views any attempt to circumvent its control as a direct threat to its existence. As a result, individuals who engage in the counter-economy often face significant risks, including legal repercussions. Despite these challenges, the growth of the counter-economy is a testament to the resilience and ingenuity of those who value freedom above the false security offered by state intervention.
The expansion of digital currencies like Bitcoin has given new momentum to the Agorist movement, demonstrating the viability of decentralized financial systems. As more people recognize the benefits of operating outside the state’s purview, the principles of Agorism gain more adherents, setting the stage for a profound transformation in how society understands and engages with the concept of the market. This shift is not merely economic; it is deeply political, reflecting a growing consensus that true freedom is found not under the shadow of the state, but in the light of voluntary, unregulated interaction.
State Folly: Mimicking Market Freedom
The state’s endeavors to emulate the free market can be observed in its recent forays into digital currencies and other market-like innovations. Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) stand as the most blatant example of this mimicry, where governments worldwide are attempting to harness blockchain technology—not to foster freedom or privacy but to maintain and expand their fiscal surveillance and control. This paradoxical approach underscores a fundamental misunderstanding of the very essence of decentralized technologies, which were designed to operate independently of central authorities.
Apart from CBDCs, other forms of state mimicry include deregulation efforts that often come with hidden strings attached—regulations that are removed only to be replaced by other forms of control, or public-private partnerships where the state ostensibly reduces its role but continues to pull the strings behind the scenes. These actions are advertised as moves towards a more open and free market, yet they invariably retain mechanisms that ensure state oversight and intervention. The state cannot truly replicate the free market because its existence and sustenance rely on coercion and control, antithetical to the market’s voluntary nature.
Moreover, the state’s attempts to adopt market mechanisms often result in inefficient half-measures that neither satisfy the demand for true market interactions nor function with the efficiency of genuine free markets. These initiatives are typically riddled with bureaucracy and influenced by political agendas, leading to distorted markets that cannot adapt to consumer needs as fluidly as a free market would. The inefficiency of state-run pseudo-markets becomes glaringly apparent when compared to the dynamic nature of truly free markets, where innovation and customer satisfaction drive progress.
This inherent inefficiency in state attempts to mimic the market is not merely an economic problem; it is a source of growing frustration among the populace. As people become more educated about and experienced with the capabilities of technologies like blockchain, their tolerance for state inefficiencies and control diminishes. This growing discontent is fertile ground for the principles of Agorism, which offer a stark contrast through advocating for markets free from state meddling.
The irony of the state’s efforts is that each attempt to control or replicate the market only serves to highlight the superior efficiency and morality of Agorist principles. As the state stumbles in its attempts to wield new technologies for control, it inadvertently demonstrates the value of those technologies in circumventing state oversight. This revelation fuels the expansion of the counter-economy, as more individuals begin to see the practical benefits of engaging in market interactions outside the state’s purview.
Unintended Consequences: Empowering Agorism
The state’s misguided attempts to harness free market mechanisms through centralized technologies and half-hearted deregulations unwittingly serve as a powerful endorsement for Agorism. Each regulatory misstep and failed implementation of market mimics becomes a lesson in the inherent advantages of a truly free market, drawing sharp distinctions between the coercive nature of state interventions and the voluntary, efficient nature of Agorist practices.
CBDCs, intended to modernize the financial system under the guise of blockchain innovation, actually illustrate the dangers of centralized control. They highlight the privacy concerns and potential for government overreach inherent in such systems, prompting a section of the populace to explore and adopt more secure, decentralized alternatives like Bitcoin. This shift is gradually fostering a deeper appreciation for the principles of non-coercion and privacy, which are fundamental to Agorism.
Moreover, the inefficiency of state-engineered market solutions often leads to economic distortions, creating niches where the counter-economy can thrive. Entrepreneurs and consumers disillusioned with the state’s pseudo-market offerings find solace and opportunity in the counter-economy, where innovation is not stifled by red tape. Here, the market is not just an economic space but a form of protest and liberation from the state’s clutches, showcasing the practical applications of Agorist principles.
This inadvertent promotion of Agorism by the state does not stop at economic interactions. It extends into social and cultural realms where state failures underscore the benefits of community-driven solutions over centralized ones. From local food cooperatives to decentralized online platforms, examples of Agorist principles in action are proliferating, offering a compelling alternative to state-provided services and regulations.
The unintended consequence of the state’s attempts to mimic the market is a growing awareness and adoption of Agorism, not just as a theoretical alternative but as a practical solution to state failures. People are increasingly questioning the necessity of the state in their economic lives, a trend that could eventually lead to a broader societal shift towards the ideals of the Agora.
The Expansion of the Agora
As more individuals experience the benefits of the counter-economy and witness the failures of state interventions, the Agora begins to expand beyond its initial confines. This expansion is not just in terms of economic transactions but as a comprehensive cultural and social movement that embraces the principles of self-governance, voluntary cooperation, and mutual aid.
The growth of the Agora is marked by an increase in networks and communities that operate based on trust and reciprocal benefit rather than coercion. These networks are not limited to clandestine market activities but include a wide array of social endeavors from education and healthcare to mutual aid societies and neighborhood watch programs. The Agora becomes a tangible alternative to the state, offering real-world solutions that are both efficient and aligned with the moral principles of non-coercion and respect for individual autonomy.
Furthermore, the technological advancements that initially spurred the state to mimic the market—such as blockchain and decentralized platforms—become tools in the hands of Agorists. These technologies enable the Agora to operate more openly and efficiently, connecting individuals across the globe and allowing them to transact and cooperate without the need for state intervention. This global network of Agorists not only strengthens the counter-economy but also creates a robust infrastructure for a parallel society that can function independently of traditional state systems.
The expansion of the Agora is also facilitated by the growing disillusionment with political solutions. As the inefficacies and corruption inherent in political systems become more apparent, people turn to Agorism as a practical alternative that promises actual change through direct action rather than through the ballot box. This shift represents a profound change in societal attitudes towards governance, favoring decentralized action and individual empowerment over centralized authority and political representation.
As the Agora grows, it challenges the very legitimacy of the state by proving that a society can organize itself effectively without the need for a coercive governing body. This challenge is not just theoretical; it is evidenced by the success of Agorist principles in creating prosperous and cooperative communities that operate on the basis of voluntary interaction. The practical successes of the Agora serve as a powerful argument against the necessity of the state, suggesting that the state is not a fundamental aspect of human society but a historical anomaly that can be overcome.
The rise of the Agora also brings with it a cultural shift towards greater personal responsibility and a revaluation of freedom as a core societal value. As individuals take control of their economic and social lives, they develop a deeper appreciation for freedom—not just as an abstract concept, but as a tangible reality that impacts every aspect of their lives. This cultural shift is perhaps the most profound effect of the Agora, as it changes how people view their relationships with each other and with the broader community.
Conclusion
The state’s attempts to mimic the free market through initiatives like CBDCs and other regulatory reforms are not merely ineffective; they are counterproductive. These efforts inadvertently highlight the benefits of a truly free market as envisioned by Agorist philosophy, catalyzing the growth of the Agora and empowering individuals to seek alternatives to state control. As more people embrace the principles of Agorism, the Agora expands, offering a viable model for a society based on voluntary cooperation and mutual respect rather than coercion and control.
This expansion is not limited to economic transactions but encompasses a wide range of social and cultural interactions, creating a comprehensive alternative to the state that promises more than just economic efficiency—it promises a more free, just, and prosperous society. The inevitable conclusion is that the state, with its inherent coercion and inefficiency, is becoming increasingly obsolete. The future, as the Agora vividly demonstrates, belongs to those who value freedom, embrace responsibility, and reject the coercive apparatus of the state.
As this narrative unfolds, it becomes clear that the march towards freedom is not just a theoretical ideal but a practical reality. The growing evidence of successful Agorist practices challenges the traditional view of the state as an indispensable part of society. Instead, it reveals a world where individuals are capable of organizing themselves in ways that are more ethical, efficient, and conducive to human flourishing.
The rise of the Agora signifies a paradigm shift—a move away from hierarchical, coercive governance towards a society organized around principles of decentralization and voluntary association. This shift represents a fundamental change in the relationship between the individual and societal structures, emphasizing empowerment over submission and dialogue over decree. As the Agora expands, it brings with it the promise of a new era where freedom is not merely a granted right but a lived experience.
Moreover, the challenges that lie ahead for the Agora are not trivial. The state will not willingly cede control, and the transition towards a fully realized Agorist society will involve struggles both ideological and practical. However, the tools and technologies that facilitate this transition are already in place, and the momentum is building. Blockchain technology, decentralized platforms, and a growing global consciousness about the virtues of freedom and self-governance are paving the way for the Agora to flourish.
This movement is not isolated; it is part of a global awakening to the possibilities of a life free from state interference. From local communities embracing Agorist principles to international networks of trade and cooperation, the seeds of change are germinating in diverse soils. The success stories of these communities, where cooperation and freedom replace coercion and control, offer a blueprint for others to follow.
In conclusion, the state’s attempts to mimic the free market through controlled and half-hearted measures have inadvertently accelerated the societal shift towards Agorism. As more individuals and communities witness the efficacy and ethical superiority of the Agora, the appeal of Agorist principles becomes undeniable. The path forward is clear: a society where the free market is not an idealized concept but a practical reality, where the state becomes an obsolete remnant of a bygone era, and where individuals enjoy true freedom and prosperity. The Agora stands not just as a market but as a testament to what is possible when individuals come together in the spirit of voluntary cooperation and mutual respect. The future, bright with the promise of liberty, is in the hands of those who dare to live freely.
Free Market Militia is an Agorist transformed by the overreach of the COVID-19 measures. Now, he delves into the free market of ideas, empowering others with knowledge about their rights and liberties.
In this recording John Coleman highlights the cutting-edge research Apocatastasis Institute staff and series hosts are involved in; also, he covers the discouragement of boys in school, and the ponzi scheme which are private colleges in America.
“A proud product of public education, John Coleman received his undergraduate degree in history from Western Connecticut State University. Alas, that was to be the end of his flattering academic titles. Unwilling to once again become a debt slave to usurers, his graduate studies were scotched at the half-way point. John wasted over a decade of his professional life attempting to establish a high school for a community who took neither themselves nor their worldview seriously. Burned by these unseemly experiences, on Holy Saturday of 2013 Apocatastasis Institute was founded.“
Twelve years ago, a universal energetic shift began during the four days of the Winter Solstice, empowering us into a new era of being. As human evolution in a critical mass often crawls at a glacial pace, this metamorphic shift has been commonly overlooked and unfulfilled. Given humanity tends to exist in a reactive vacuum of instinct and/or intellect, the momentum of this exponential progression passed through our preoccupied senses primarily undiscovered. The universal energy of the shift is all encompassing, as is its essential empowerment. This new era encourages us to embody our soul as an expression of universality.
The Rise of Egocentricity
The US Election triggered our repressed instincts, thoughts and emotions, springing into our awareness through the expression of our reactivity. I observed how many responded to the electoral melee with graphic projections of rampant adolescence. For some, egocentricity erupted with arrogance, entitlement, self-righteousness and superiority. While for others, it ignited anger, fear, frustration and hopelessness. Many regressed into their adolescence, personalizing the outcome in the extreme. We all encountered unconscious and unresolved facets of our unfulfilled being. Yet, few chose to explore their opportunity.
Unwarranted Opinion
Many forms of media have descended into editorial madness; proliferating agenda-laden storylines, programming us into propagandized narratives, while pandering to our personal ideologies. When we are confident in our indoctrination; we seek to compensate for our insecurities with fictitious rhetoric. We emulate our oratory as a strategy to alter another’s perception, in justification of our postulation. It is a popular practice to offer our unfiltered convictions, cast in the form of unwarranted opinions. This intensifies volatile, social environments with the toxicity of our egocentricity, all in the name of vanity.
The Greatest Divide
The existential division we observe in society is not exclusive to our relativity with others, or our daily life. It reflects the self-schism we enable with our oblivion to our soul and the universe. Arrogance, entitlement, self-righteousness and superiority are the defense-mechanisms we establish to protect us from perceived threats we may encounter in our everyday endeavors to survive. Our focus of awareness eventually pivots from our relationship with ourselves, our soul and the universe, settling into our dependence on and existence in social reality. The greatest divide we will ever endure is with our soul.
“Our soul is the Universe.”
On the Threshold
For over a decade, humanity has been on the threshold of universality. When the pandemic occurred in 2020, it was our opportunity to observe, discover, explore and embody our soul as an expression of the universe. Since 2012, we have all stood upon our personal threshold of universal being, regardless of our virtuosity with consciousness, manifestation, relativity and transformation. Throughout the expanse of our human experience, our soul has been holding the space for us to shift into universality. When we reflect, release and transform, we transcend.
The Era of Transcendence
Habitual engagement in social reality severs our relativity with our soul and the universe. Where we focus our attention is where we conduct our energy. Our inherent interaction with sociality is often an unconscious simulation, given our dependencies on amusement, delusion, distraction and preoccupation. Our existence is defined by how we react to our environment, rather than experiencing who we are being in the present. The Solstice Shift is an exodus from our enslavement in virtuality. It reunites us with our soul to empower our universality. This is the embodiment of our transcendence.
Soul Streaming
Currently, we are all confronted by the transitional shifts converging on every dimensional facet of our being. Given we collectively exhibit instinct and intellect, our emotional, intuitive and spiritual shifts transpire beyond our everyday virtuality. Our capacity to experience and transform the energetic movements evolving in our heart, intuition and soul is often a futile endeavor. As we transcend social reality, our relativity with our soul resonates beyond our peripheral existence. When we are aligned, balanced and centered, our soul streams consciousness in the flow of universality.
Becoming the Flow
Our soul and the universe are one, emanating universality through our intuition, and into the centers of our being. The torus in our heart center empowers eternal revolutions of omnidimensional energy. Our focus and intention, or lack thereof, defines the nature of our feelings, thoughts and actions, thus our experience. When we resonate with our soul, we are empowered by universality within the expression of our unique flow. Establishing the equilibrium between the facets of our being, amidst the fluctuating currents of our internal and external environments, is essential in resonating with the universal stream of consciousness.
The Solstice Shift
The Winter Solstice is a four-day progression of completion, renewal and transformation. During this shift, every antiquated action, thought and feeling inhibiting our ascension emerges from our existential unconscious to be healed and released. In this space of clarity, insight and understanding, we either cling to our engagements in virtuality, or we empower our personal transcendence. Since the Winter Solstice in 2012, universal energy has been streaming into our being. The Solstice Shift is our evolutionary transcendence; to express the resonance of universality and be an embodiment of our soul.
In financial news, Organigram released its 2024 fiscal report, and Aurora announced a distribution partnership between MedReleaf Australia and The Entourage Effect.
Craft Kings Cannabis Groupannounced its acquisition of BC Green Farms Ltd, located in Duncan, British Columbia. The move triples Craft King’s cultivation space.
Delta 9 is well-poised to become Manitoba’s cannabis superstore thanks to its upcoming acquisition by FIKA Company, shares FIKA CEO Mark Vasey with the Winnipeg Free Press. All Delta 9 stores currently operating in Manitoba will continue to operate under the same name, but the number of products they will carry will expand from around 200 to 800.
During the holiday season, the SQDC will offer in-branch and online services, according to a modified schedule, between Tuesday, December 24, 2024 and Thursday, January 2, 2025.
Edmonton Police say charges have been laid against a 19-year-old man in connection with a series of robberies that targeted cannabis and convenience stores in Calgary and Edmonton. StratCann covered those robberieshere. The suspect is believed to be connected to 17 robberies in Calgary and four in Edmonton, which occurred between Sunday, September 1, 2024, and Monday, December 16, 2024.
Cannara Biotech Inc.announced that it will be relying on CSA Coordinated Blanket Order 51-913 for an exemption from the requirements to send proxy-related materials for its upcoming annual general meeting to be held on January 30, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., due to the current delays and suspension of mail service in Canada as a result of the nationwide strike of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers that commenced on November 15, 2024.
A staff report in Melfort, Saskatchewan,recommends against limiting the number of cannabis shops in the town about two hours northeast of Saskatoon. In October, Into the Weeds Cannabis and Saskabuds Cannabis requested that Council consider limiting the number of cannabis retail stores in Melfort to two. Director of Community Services Rob Lok said Council will decide whether to limit the number of cannabis stores in the city at their next council meeting on January 13.
High Tide Inc. announced the openings of its 190th and 191stCanna Cabana branded retail cannabis locations in Canada: the 84th in the province of Alberta and the 76th in the province of Ontario.
MTL Cannabis Corp.announced that it has fully repaid its 13.25% mortgage, which was originally issued by MTL’s predecessor company to a private lender prior to the Company’s business combination with Canada House Cannabis Group.
The Research Society on Marijuana (RSMJ) published a special issue with 12 research papers on cannabis in Canada post-legalization in the journal Cannabis, an open-access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of marijuana/cannabis from a multidisciplinary perspective.
More than 20 workers at the Cannabis 21+ dispensary in San Diego, California, voted to join UFCW Local 135. In addition to Cannabis 21+, UFCW Local 135 represents over 400 cannabis workers in San Diego and Imperial Valley’s cannabis industries.
The future of the US hemp industry remains on the line as lawmakers once again put a five-year farm bill reauthorization package on the back burner and instead agreed to a one-year extension in the final days of the current Congress, reports the Cannabis Business Times.
The government in the Netherlands recently announced that as of April 7, 2025, coffee shops in municipalities participating in the nation’s Closed Coffee Shop Chain Experiment will only be allowed to sell regulated cannabis.
In financial news, Organigram released its 2024 fiscal report, and Aurora announced a distribution partnership between MedReleaf Australia and The Entourage Effect.
Craft Kings Cannabis Groupannounced its acquisition of BC Green Farms Ltd, located in Duncan, British Columbia. The move triples Craft King’s cultivation space.
Delta 9 is well-poised to become Manitoba’s cannabis superstore thanks to its upcoming acquisition by FIKA Company, shares FIKA CEO Mark Vasey with the Winnipeg Free Press. All Delta 9 stores currently operating in Manitoba will continue to operate under the same name, but the number of products they will carry will expand from around 200 to 800.
During the holiday season, the SQDC will offer in-branch and online services, according to a modified schedule, between Tuesday, December 24, 2024 and Thursday, January 2, 2025.
Edmonton Police say charges have been laid against a 19-year-old man in connection with a series of robberies that targeted cannabis and convenience stores in Calgary and Edmonton. StratCann covered those robberieshere. The suspect is believed to be connected to 17 robberies in Calgary and four in Edmonton, which occurred between Sunday, September 1, 2024, and Monday, December 16, 2024.
Cannara Biotech Inc.announced that it will be relying on CSA Coordinated Blanket Order 51-913 for an exemption from the requirements to send proxy-related materials for its upcoming annual general meeting to be held on January 30, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., due to the current delays and suspension of mail service in Canada as a result of the nationwide strike of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers that commenced on November 15, 2024.
A staff report in Melfort, Saskatchewan,recommends against limiting the number of cannabis shops in the town about two hours northeast of Saskatoon. In October, Into the Weeds Cannabis and Saskabuds Cannabis requested that Council consider limiting the number of cannabis retail stores in Melfort to two. Director of Community Services Rob Lok said Council will decide whether to limit the number of cannabis stores in the city at their next council meeting on January 13.
High Tide Inc. announced the openings of its 190th and 191stCanna Cabana branded retail cannabis locations in Canada: the 84th in the province of Alberta and the 76th in the province of Ontario.
MTL Cannabis Corp.announced that it has fully repaid its 13.25% mortgage, which was originally issued by MTL’s predecessor company to a private lender prior to the Company’s business combination with Canada House Cannabis Group.
The Research Society on Marijuana (RSMJ) published a special issue with 12 research papers on cannabis in Canada post-legalization in the journal Cannabis, an open-access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of marijuana/cannabis from a multidisciplinary perspective.
More than 20 workers at the Cannabis 21+ dispensary in San Diego, California, voted to join UFCW Local 135. In addition to Cannabis 21+, UFCW Local 135 represents over 400 cannabis workers in San Diego and Imperial Valley’s cannabis industries.
The future of the US hemp industry remains on the line as lawmakers once again put a five-year farm bill reauthorization package on the back burner and instead agreed to a one-year extension in the final days of the current Congress, reports the Cannabis Business Times.
The government in the Netherlands recently announced that as of April 7, 2025, coffee shops in municipalities participating in the nation’s Closed Coffee Shop Chain Experiment will only be allowed to sell regulated cannabis.
Welcome to the Good Weed Board on StratCann, part nine! In my last column, we scrutinized the cheap weed system and explained why consumers should beware of some pre-rolls, vape oils, and milled flower.
Here in Part Nine, we present the Twelve Rules of the OG Rating Guide. Let’s begin with the basics.
Rule #1: Professional scissors are better than any kind of grinder. Yes, grinders work faster. But attention to detail is crucial when breaking apart dried flower for quality-grading purposes.
Rule #2: Thin rolling papers provide a smoother burn. The best ones are generally not found inside your average convenience store. I like the OCB Ultimate or Elements ultra-thin rice papers.
Rule #3: It’s best to ignore the misinformation on package labels. We know that Indica and Sativa are bogus claims. The same is true for THC and Terpene percentages. COA results can be fabricated, and many brands are culpable. For examples of best-in-class labelling, check out Organnicraft, Victoria Cannabis Company, or Book Club.
Rule #4: Visual appeal is an overrated metric. Flavour and burn quality are more important. Too many growers these days release buds that are nice-looking but taste and burn inadequately.
Rule #5: Hand-rolled joints are the best way to judge quality. It’s fine to bong, it’s okay to vape, but these actions don’t provide a complete flavour experience. Smoking is the best way to realize the more subtle and complex notes of cannabis.
Rule #6: Ash colour is an indicator of burn quality. Supreme burn quality means the joint stays lit and burns easily. Lighter-coloured buds tend to burn more enthusiastically, while darker-coloured buds often burn reluctantly and with a darker ash.
Rule #7: Remediation degrades craft dried flower. The practice can lead to moisture imbalance, which causes bud to break apart into weird little bits instead of being sticky or fluffy. Secondary metabolites can also be diminished.
Rule #8: The 3.5-gram is a regrettable format. Eighths are viable in a deli-style scenario, but the package size fails to balance moisture content throughout a CPG distribution system. More dried flower packed together works better.
Rule #9: Humidity packs are a red flag. They degrade aromatic phytochemicals and shouldn’t be required. I’ve bought Homestead ounces without any pack that were still well balanced six months after the package date. Curing definitely matters.
Rule #10: Scoring isn’t valid when judging multiple samples simultaneously. Graders must spend more focused time with the material they’re evaluating to gain a comprehensive sensory experience.
Rule #11: Terroir is noticeable for all types of growers. I’ve sampled multiple offerings from many different producers. Each of them has made an identifiable brand of flower. Their unique environments and ingredients play an essential role. It would be fun to establish an appellation program for cannabis.
Rule #12: Direct-to-consumer and farmgate are underutilized. These additional sales channels have enabled microbreweries, artisan coffee roasters, and cottage wineries to thrive. They can do the same for craft cannabis. Canada should eliminate the 30-gram possession limit, and the provinces should authorize bulk distribution, combined with deli-style retail. Traditional market consumers will follow.
That’s all for Part Nine. Stay tuned for Part Ten as we introduce our new classification tool: Delineating the Fuel Spectrum. Happy blazing!
Related Articles
Marty Wig is a contributor for StratCann. He’s the co-founder of Overgrown Gardens, creator of the OG Rating Guide and the Good Weed Board. All opinions expressed are his own.
“The trickster is the unconscious judging the judgments of the ego. The trickster pokes holes through the ego’s inflation. The trickster tells the dreamer to include irrationality in himself.” ~Eugene Monick
The trickster is a complex and multifaceted figure found in mythologies, folklore, philosophy, and psychology worldwide, serving several crucial roles in both individual psyche and cultural narratives.
The trickster, as an archetype, is a fundamental aspect of all humans. It’s both a sacred and a profane energy, both dynamic and traumatic, both reverent and sacrilegious.
It teaches this above all: anyone seeking to be wise must first become a fool to gain true wisdom. The individual must always keep the shadow conscious both as an egoic deterrent (as a balancing mechanism for blinding light) and as a guard against living out our shadow side compulsively.
The trickster is the most profound personification of the archetypal shadow, symbolizing the shadow side of ideals and beliefs. As a counterpoint to one-dimensional perceptions and behaviors, the trickster takes on the sacred cows of civilization with the profane crows of actualization.
Trickster as archetype is a harsh wakeup call when we’re pretending to be asleep. Here are five profound ways the trickster keeps our ego in check.
1.) Trickster facilitates keeping the shadow conscious:
“There is no generally effective technique for assimilating the shadow. It is more like diplomacy or statesmanship, and it is always an individual matter. First one has to accept and take seriously the existence of the Shadow. Second, one has to become aware of its qualities and intentions. This happens through conscientious attention to moods, fantasies and impulses. Third, a long process of negotiation is unavoidable.” ~Daryl Sharp
The shadow, according to Jungian psychology, represents the parts of ourselves that we repress or deny, often because they are socially unacceptable or personally embarrassing.
The trickster, by engaging in behaviors that are mischievous, chaotic, or morally ambiguous, mirrors these shadow aspects. This mirroring can help individuals recognize and integrate their shadow elements rather than letting them fester and blacken in an unconscious unactualized state, which could lead to psychopathy and compulsivity, but when made conscious could potentially lead to greater self-awareness and personal growth.
In our youth it was necessary to keep the shadow in check to achieve discipline; but in our maturity, it is vital that we integrate it in order to achieve wholeness. True wholeness implies the integration of opposites.
2.) Trickster thwarts seriousness with humor:
“After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box.” ~Italian Proverb
The trickster’s antics can also provoke laughter or reflection, which can disarm the seriousness with which we often view our darker sides.
Laughter is a cultural leveling mechanism par excellence. Humor has a democratizing effect; it levels the playing field. When everyone laughs at a trickster’s antics, it momentarily erases distinctions of class, status, or expertise. This communal laughter can break down barriers, fostering a sense of unity and shared humanity. By making light of what is usually taken very seriously, the Trickster reminds us that no one is above the capacity for folly, thus reducing the weight of seriousness.
Picture the heyoka (a Native American term for the tribal clown or jester) who helped the tribe stay in touch with the shadow side of life via transgressive behaviors, funny situations, and other activities that upturned typical reality.
The trickster archetype is adept at exposing us to absurdity. Through humor, the trickster can shift perspectives, making the unbearable bearable and the unchangeable seem less oppressive. Highlighting the often ridiculous nature of human behavior or societal rules, the absurdity of the trickster’s actions mirrors the absurdity in our own lives or societies, prompting laughter at ourselves and the Cosmic Joke.
3.) Trickster deflates the ego:
“The trickster is the ego demolitions expert who helps us become more realistic about our psychological limitations and ultimately our spiritual limitlessness.” ~Dave Richo
When the ego becomes inflated, believing itself to be more important or capable than it truly is, the trickster comes into play by exposing or undermining our grandiosity. Through pranks, reversals, or unexpected turns of events, the trickster can humble us, reminding us of our limitations and human fallibility. This deflation is not just about humiliation but about realigning our self-perception with reality, fostering humility and a more balanced ego.
Trickster forces our head over the ledge of the abyss. “Laugh or die!” he says. Laugh or die. We either embrace the absurdity of an indifferent universe and have a laugh, or we assuage ourselves with delusions of grandeur and suffer when our expectations are not met. The human condition is a labyrinth of unknown despair. There are too many dead ends. All the more reason to make cultivating a good sense of humor our primary task.
The beauty of letting go of our sense of entitlement is that eventually we realize everything is connected to everything else. We see how we are the world, and the world is us. We don’t need anything because it’s already a part of us. Our ego goes from being a self-entitled tyrant to a self-overcoming liberator.
4.) Trickster even has healing potential:
“Doctors study medicine. Teachers study education. Healers study darkness.” ~Mark Lundy
The trickster often operates at the boundary between health and sickness, life and death, order and chaos. In many myths, tricksters are healers or bringers of medicine, not through traditional means but through unexpected or unorthodox methods. They can introduce healing by breaking patterns or by making people confront what they’ve been avoiding.
This healing can be psychological, helping individuals to overcome rigid ways of thinking, or it can be social, bringing about change or reconciliation in communities stuck in old conflicts or outdated norms.
The flower of our ability to heal has its roots in the depths of our wounds. Before mastery, shadow work. After mastery, shadow work. This has been the way of all healers since time immemorial. And no force but the trickster has the wherewithal and cunning enough to trick us into this sacred confrontation.
5.) Trickster helps break us open for spontaneity and creativity:
“A joyful life is an individual creation that cannot be copied from a recipe.” ~ Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
The trickster’s role in breaking down structures, expectations, and the known is perhaps where its most liberating function lies. By disrupting the status quo, the trickster forces individuals and societies to adapt, innovate, and think differently.
This breaking open can lead to new insights, creativity, and spontaneity. The trickster encourages a playful approach to life, one where not all is planned and where the unexpected can be a source of growth rather than fear. This is particularly relevant in artistic endeavors where breaking away from convention can lead to breakthroughs.
In essence, the trickster archetype serves as a catalyst for individual and collective transformation by reflecting and integrating the shadow, humbling the ego, facilitating healing through unconventional means, and unleashing creativity by breaking down rigid structures and expectations.
This archetype, while often seen as disruptive, plays a vital role in maintaining psychological balance and cultural evolution, reminding us of the value in chaos, change, and the unexpected. Play on, trickster. Play on.
Gary Z McGee, a former Navy Intelligence Specialist turned philosopher, is the author of Birthday Suit of God and The Looking Glass Man. His works are inspired by the great philosophers of the ages and his wide-awake view of the modern world.
This article (Trickster Archetype: The Ultimate Ego Leveling Mechanism) was originally created and published by Self-inflicted Philosophy and is printed here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Gary Z McGee and self-inflictedphilosophy.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this statement of copyright.
The DEA is requesting approval from an agency judge to issue subpoenas compelling officials from the FDA to testify at forthcoming hearings regarding the Biden administration’s proposal to reschedule cannabis.
Friday was the deadline for parties involved in the hearing to submit additional materials, including evidence and witness information, to DEA Judge John Mulrooney as part of the pre-hearing process.
The DEA stated in its filing that it plans to subpoena four FDA officials, even though the HHS previously stated that it wouldn’t voluntarily participate in the proceedings. Additionally, the DEA announced its intention to introduce thousands of comments from the public submitted during the rulemaking process as evidence. This is despite the judge’s prior ruling that public comments are not admissible as evidence, warning the agency against attempting to use them inappropriately.
Judge Mulrooney cautioned that overwhelming the court with inadmissible comments could create the impression of a delay tactic, even if unintentional. The DEA defended its position by arguing that including public comments as evidence is crucial for decision-makers, given their significance to the proposed rulemaking. To address the logistical challenges posed by the volume of comments, the agency requested permission to submit them in electronic form rather than as physical documents.
In its recent filing, the DEA also provided details about the anticipated testimony of the four FDA officials it seeks to subpoena. According to the agency, the officials would provide critical information about the medical and scientific evaluations conducted as part of the HHS Eight-Factor analysis, which forms the foundation of the proposed rescheduling.
The analysis examines several aspects of a substance, including its potential for abuse, known pharmacological effects, current scientific knowledge, history and patterns of misuse, risks to public health, dependence liability, and whether it is a precursor to other controlled substances.
The DEA further explained that witnesses would discuss cannabis’ medical use, including its widespread application in states and the recognition of such use by regulatory entities overseeing medical practice. Additionally, witnesses are expected to address how medical marijuana is currently used in the U.S., despite its designation as a Schedule I drug.
The ongoing proceedings have sparked concerns among marijuana reform advocates about potential bias within the DEA’s handling of the rulemaking process. Some view the agency’s dual role as both the proponent of the proposed rule and the entity overseeing the hearings with skepticism.
The marijuana industry, including enterprises like Green Thumb Industries Inc. (CSE: GTII) (OTCQX: GTBIF), looks forward to the next steps of the rescheduling process and the final ruling that will be made on the CSA status of marijuana.
About CNW420
CNW420 spotlights the latest developments in the rapidly evolving cannabis industry through the release of an article each business day at 4:20 p.m. Eastern – a tribute to the time synonymous with cannabis culture. The concise, informative content serves as a gateway for investors interested in the legalized cannabis sector and provides updates on how regulatory developments may impact financial markets. If marijuana and the burgeoning industry surrounding it are on your radar, CNW420 is for you! Check back daily to stay up-to-date on the latest milestones in the fast -changing world of cannabis.
To receive SMS alerts from CNW, text CANNABIS to 888-902-4192 (U.S. Mobile Phones Only)
Please see full terms of use and disclaimers on the CannabisNewsWire website applicable to all content provided by CNW, wherever published or re-published: https://www.CannabisNewsWire.com/Disclaimer
Brand commitment is finally normalizing in the cannabis industry, meaning niches are trending, and consumers are looking for brands that connect with their individuality. One particular area within the cannabis space that is also gaining recognition surrounds the representation of Indigenous peoples and their businesses. First Nations, Métis and Inuit involvement began at a low point when the Cannabis Act was initiated, leaving many to criticize the lack of council sought to discuss the avenues of legalization.
Years later, communications about sovereign land rights, financial aid programs, the Red Market, band-led businesses and Indigenous brands finally began breaking the barriers. As a result, many have witnessed the success of indigenous-led brands. But what qualifies a cannabis business as Indigenous? Is it something we can genuinely quantify?
Beyond branding in British Columbia
Currently, the BCLDB website features a list of precisely five LPs under the B.C. Indigenous Cannabis Product (BCICP) program, where cultivators and processes must have at least 51 per cent Indigenous ownership of facilities in British Columbia. This leaves to question how many are Indigenous-run but have not applied or qualified for this program. And what about retail locations? Grow teams? Or sales and marketing firms? All of those who contribute to economic growth, product preparation and jobs funnelling into the industry. Where can these operations be found featured in a comprehensive list?
So, I ask: how can we recognize and celebrate those who may employ the majority of Indigenous peoples? Or those who may not own 51 per cent of their brands but initiate internal practices that reflect traditional practices? And what about the licensed producers whose leadership and employees proudly own their indigeneity, even though their identity may not be predominantly present in their B2C branding?
Advertisement
Follow the insights given by a mix of three LPs that represent indigeneity differently – some you might not know are owned by First Nations or Métis peoples.
The beginning of recognition
Allowing space for Indigenous voices to be heard, amplifying representation and pushing for inclusive policies is the beginning point to better the industry for the workers within the cannabis community. One perspective not spoken of too popularly is that of non-indigenous individuals or those lacking stereotypical identifiers;an instance of an identity crisis known too well by many biracial First Nations and Métis peoples.
It is important to be clear: not involving one’s indigeneity does not diminish or reduce one’s heritage nor require the explanation of a person, leadership or brand’s background to the public – we don’t owe anyone the justification of where we come from and why we do or do not include personal identity, especially around branding. But those who share this badge of honour can inspire others to take their own route in brand identity.
Alannah Davis, Métis CEO of Dabble Cannabis Co. in Cowachin Valley (processing & cultivation), addressed this, stating that one of the biggest challenges is embracing and representing Indigenous heritageauthentically. This involves balancing limited personal experience with a genuine desire to learn and honour family histories.
Advertisement
Notions like this remind us that anyone can represent history despite the force used to remove them through decades of colonial impacts. Celebration and recognition of identity exist in as many forms as people do – indigeneity has become as individual as communal through relearning who we are. Past, present and future.
“Everyone carries the learned behaviours of their ancestors, and by being your authentic self –including your heritage to what degree feels right for you –and for us finding the grit and determination to make it through the challenges that being in this industry faces.” Words of great insight by Davis as she described the unique strengths Indigenous-owned brands can host.
Actions always speak louder
Identity cannot be evaluated like organic certification or what makes a flower ‘craft.’ It is incredibly layered and complex to define at the individual, communal and business levels. This was quickly decided for the BCICP program brand Jbuds Craft Cannabis, based out of Summerland (micro-cultivation & micro-processing).Master Grower Noah Johnson shared four pillars dear to the heart of their operations for empowerment and inclusion:
Sustainable practices: Emphasizing eco-friendly practices from water conservation to organic growing methods and sustainable packaging as a commitment to traditional practices.
Transparency & education: Two items many Indigenous peoples spotlight as key actions to make a difference in including and improving community and industry engagement.
Leadership development: Management training for employees to support Indigenous workers in advancing their careers and advancement in the company.
Flexible scheduling: Allowing and encouraging allocated time off for cultural events, like ceremonies and practicing traditions, to foster a professional environment that respects employees’ cultural identities.
With Jbuds, the brand’s values and mission align admirably with heritage, despite not publicly disclosing until now. “Even if not publicly emphasized, these actions demonstrate respect for cultural heritage, community well-being and the importance of providing meaningful opportunities for Indigenous people.”
Advertisement
Combining craft and culture
The owners of the Oliver-based brand Pineapple Buds, Kyra Horvath and Laine Keyes, address influences on identity by explaining that their brand’s intended focus is on the sweet flavours of their product offerings with a ‘millennial twist’ rather than their Indigenous roots – at least for now. For many businesses like Pineapple Buds, there’s room for branding elements and messaging to spotlight their Indigenous background when there are more inclusive opportunities and in their next stages of development. “You shouldn’t have to have heritage at the forefront in order to be seen as an Indigenous brand,” says the pair at Pineapple Buds. They revealed that both customers and industry reach out to increase supportafter discovering they are an Indigenous brand. Ambiguous regulation standards also complicate the matter, leading some brands into communal and privatized avenues rather than those provided federally.
Recognition is reconciliation
Native’s loudness and pride come in all forms of acknowledgement for Indigenous heritage and backgrounds. And there seems to be no better time to emphasize celebrating these brands to bring awareness to their contributions, mission and values, regardless of what form acknowledgements of heritage may be.
Applaudable actions have been taken so that brands Indigenous and not can begin to support employees, businesses and communities by putting inclusive recognition and education at the forefront of initiatives. Lastly and quite simply, government programs and treaties are not the only definitions of what it means to be Indigenous.
Aly K. Benson (AKB) is a biracial Cree writer and strategist currently residing on the ancestral lands of the Syilx/Okanagan peoples.
Recent Comments