More Carbon Dioxide Is Good, Less is Bad

By Gregory Wrightstone

People should be celebrating, not demonizing, modern increases in  atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). We cannot overstate the importance of  the gas. Without it, life doesn’t exist.

First, a bit of history: During each of the last four glacial  advances, CO2’s concentration fell below 190 parts per million (ppm),  less than 50 percent of our current concentration of 420 ppm. When  glaciers began receding about 14,000 years ago – a blink in geological  time – CO2 levels fell to 182 ppm, a concentration thought to be the  lowest in Earth’s history.

Line of Death

Why is this alarming? Because below 150 ppm, most terrestrial plant life dies. Without plants, there are no animals.

In other words, the Earth came within 30 ppm in CO2’s atmospheric  concentration of witnessing the extinction of most land-based plants and  all higher terrestrial life-forms – nearly a true climate apocalypse.  Before industrialization began adding CO2 to the atmosphere, there was  no telling whether the critical 150-ppm threshold wouldn’t be reached  during the next glacial period.

Contrary to the mantra that today’s CO2 concentration is  unprecedentedly high, our current geologic period, the Quaternary, has  seen the lowest average levels of carbon dioxide since the end of the  Pre-Cambrian Period more than 600 million years ago. The average CO2  concentration throughout Earth’s history was more than 2,600 ppm, nearly  seven times current levels.

Beneficial CO2 Increases

CO2 increased from 280 ppm in 1750 to 420 ppm today, most of it after  World War II as industrial activity accelerated. The higher  concentration has been beneficial because of the gas’s role as a plant  food in increasing photosynthesis.

Its benefits include:

— Faster plant growth with less water and larger crop yields.

— Expansion of forests and grasslands.

— Less erosion of topsoil because of more plant growth.

— Increases in plants’ natural insect repellents.

A summary of 270 laboratory studies covering 83 food crops showed  that increasing CO2 concentrations by 300 ppm boosts plant growth by an  average of 46 percent. Conversely, many studies show adverse effects of  low-CO2 environments.

For instance, one indicated that, compared to today, plant growth was  eight percent less in the period before the Industrial Revolution, with  a low concentration of 280 ppm CO2.

Therefore, attempts to reduce CO2 concentrations are bad for plants, animals and humankind.

Data reported in a recent paper by Dr. Indur Goklany, and published  by the CO2 Coalition, indicates that up to 50 percent of Earth’s  vegetated areas became greener between 1982-2011.

Researchers attribute 70 percent of the greening to CO2 fertilization  from of fossil fuel emissions. (Another nine percent is attributed to  fertilizers derived from fossil fuels.)

Dr. Goklany also reported that the beneficial fertilization effect of  CO2 – along with the use of hydrocarbon-dependent machinery, pesticides  and fertilizers – have saved at least 20 percent of land area from  being converted to agricultural purposes – an area 25 percent larger  than North America.

The amazing increase in agricultural productivity, partly the result  of more CO2, has allowed the planet to feed eight billion people,  compared to the fewer than 800,000 inhabitants living a short 300 years  ago.

More CO2 in the air means more moisture in the soil. The major cause  of water loss in plants is attributable to transpiration, in which the  stomata, or pores, on the undersides of the leaves open to absorb CO2  and expel oxygen and water vapor.

With more CO2, the stomata are open for shorter periods, the leaves  lose less water, and more moisture remains in the soil. The associated  increase in soil moisture has been linked to global decreases in  wildfires, droughts and heat waves.

Exaggeration of CO2’s Warming Effect

Alarm over global warming stems from exaggerations of CO2’s potential  to retain heat that otherwise would radiate to outer space. As with  water vapor, methane and nitrous oxide, CO2 retains heat in the  atmosphere by how it reacts to infrared portions of the electromagnetic  spectrum.

However, the gas has saturated to a large extent within the infrared  range, leaving relatively little potential for increased warming.

Both sides of the climate debate agree that the warming effect of  each molecule of CO2 decreases significantly (logarithmically) as the  concentration increases.

This is one reason why there was no runaway greenhouse warming when  CO2 concentrations approached 20 times that of today. This inconvenient  fact, despite its importance, is rarely mentioned because it undermines  the theory of a future climate catastrophe.

A doubling of CO2 from today’s level of 420 ppm – an increase  estimated to take 200 years to attain – would have an inconsequential  effect on global temperature.

Pennsylvania’s solar-powered fossil fuels

CO2 being liberated today from Pennsylvania coal was removed from the  atmosphere by the photosynthesis of trees that fed on sunlight and  carbon dioxide and then died to have their remains accumulate in the  vast coal swamps of the Carboniferous Period.

Pennsylvania Marcellus and Utica shale hydrocarbons being exploited  today were also the likely hydrocarbon source of shallower reservoirs  producing since the late 1800s.

The source of those hydrocarbons was algae remains that gathered on the bottom of the Ordovician and Devonian seas.

Like the coal deposits, the algae used solar-powered photosynthesis  and CO2 (the algal blooms were likely fueled by regular dust storms) to  remove vast amounts of CO2 from the air and lock it up as carbon-rich  organic matter.

The provenance of these hydrocarbons spawns two novel ideas. First, there is a strong case that these are solar-powered fuels.

Second, the sequestering of carbon during the creation of the  hydrocarbons lowered atmospheric concentrations of CO2 to sub-optimum  levels for plants. Therefore, the combustion of today’s coal and gas is  liberating valuable CO2 molecules that are turbocharging plant growth.

The plain fact of the matter is that the modest warming of less than  one degree Celsius since 1900, combined with increasing CO2, is allowing  ecosystems to thrive and humanity to prosper.

Additional information on CO2’s benefits and related topics are available at CO2Coalition.org, which includes a number of publications and resources of interest.

This commentary was first published at PIOGA Just The Facts Blog  and can be accessed here.

Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist; executive director of the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, VA; and author of Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn’t Want You to Know.